VIZAGROUP logo

VIZA GROUP

2024-05-27

compensation.png

Compensation for Damage Due to Russia’s Military Actions: Legal Aspects and European Practices

In today's world, where conflicts and military actions are increasingly prevalent, the issue of compensating damage inflicted on civilians and infrastructure is particularly pertinent. Russia's armed aggression against Ukraine, which began in 2014 and significantly escalated in 2022, has caused extensive destruction and loss. This article explores the legal aspects of compensating damage caused by Russia’s military actions and examines European practices in this area.

International Legal Framework for Compensationю

International law contains norms regulating state liability for damage caused by armed conflicts. Key documents governing these issues include the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, as well as UN General Assembly Resolutions.

Geneva Conventionsю

The 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols establish rules for conducting armed conflicts and protecting war victims. They hold parties to the conflict accountable for violations of international humanitarian law and mandate compensation for damage inflicted on civilians and civilian objects.

UN General Assembly Resolutions.

UN General Assembly Resolutions, particularly Resolution 60/147 "Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law," affirm the right of victims to compensation for damage.

Mechanisms for Compensation.

Various mechanisms exist at both the international and national levels to ensure compensation for damage caused by military actions. These mechanisms include both judicial and non-judicial procedures.

Judicial Mechanisms.

One of the primary avenues for obtaining compensation is through courts, including international judicial bodies such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

International Criminal Court.

The ICC has jurisdiction to hear cases involving war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Victims of Russia's armed aggression can appeal to the ICC to hold perpetrators accountable and seek compensation for damage.

European Court of Human Rightsю

The ECHR hears complaints from individuals regarding violations of rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights. Ukrainian citizens affected by Russia’s military actions can appeal to the ECHR to protect their rights and obtain compensation.

Non-Judicial Mechanisms.

In addition to judicial mechanisms, there are also non-judicial procedures for obtaining compensation through international organizations and funds.

Compensation Funds.

International organizations such as the UN and the European Union have established special funds to assist conflict victims. These funds can provide financial support for rebuilding housing, medical assistance, and other needs of those affected.

Humanitarian Aid Programs.

Humanitarian aid programs implemented by international and national organizations also help restore infrastructure and provide necessary assistance to conflict victims.

Do you need additional assistance?

Leave a request and we will definitely contact you

European Practices in Compensation.

European countries have varying experiences in ensuring compensation for damage caused by military actions. It is important to review examples from several countries that have successfully implemented compensation mechanisms.

Germany

Germany has significant experience in paying compensation to victims of military actions and human rights violations related to World War II. The "Remembrance, Responsibility, and Future" Foundation, established in 2000, has paid billions of euros to victims of National Socialism, including forced laborers and other affected groups.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Following the end of the Bosnian War in 1995, the international community established the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to investigate war crimes and provide compensation to victims. Additionally, the Bosnian government, with support from international organizations, implemented programs for reconstruction and compensation to those affected.

Ukraine

Facing Russian aggression, Ukraine has created its own compensation mechanisms. The Ukrainian government has introduced programs for rebuilding infrastructure and supporting internally displaced persons. Legislative acts have also been developed to regulate compensation for destroyed housing and other property.

Conclusion

Compensation for damage caused by Russia’s military actions is a complex and multifaceted process that requires the application of various legal and practical mechanisms. International law provides a foundation for protecting victims' rights and their right to compensation. Judicial and non-judicial mechanisms complement each other, offering a comprehensive approach to resolving the issue.

European experience demonstrates that successful implementation of compensation mechanisms is possible through the cooperation of governments, international organizations, and civil society. It is crucial to continue developing and improving these mechanisms to ensure justice and restoration for all those affected by armed aggression.

In the context of a prolonged conflict and extensive destruction, Ukraine needs the support of the international community to ensure effective compensation for damage and country reconstruction. Joint efforts of the government, international organizations, and civil society are key to achieving this goal.